July 19, 2023

Paul Butterfield retrospective, part 2, with Tom Ellis

Paul Butterfield retrospective, part 2, with Tom Ellis

Tom Ellis joins me (again) on episode 90. This is part two of the Paul Butterfield retrospective where Tom takes us even deeper into Paul’s career and talks us through more of his incredible output. About how Butter, while paying his due respect to the greats before him, took the blues in a new direction, with his experimentation and innovation. Butter’s music and bands evolved as he developed, with the best musicians joining him to provide a bedrock to some of the greatest harmonica ever rec...

Tom Ellis joins me (again) on episode 90.

This is part two of the Paul Butterfield retrospective where Tom takes us even deeper into Paul’s career and talks us through more of his incredible output.

About how Butter, while paying his due respect to the greats before him, took the blues in a new direction, with his experimentation and innovation.

Butter’s music and bands evolved as he developed, with the best musicians joining him to provide a bedrock to some of the greatest harmonica ever recorded. 

Tom Ellis puts forward a compelling case for Paul Butterfield as the most influential harmonica player ever, with his cultural and societal impact overshadowing even the classic players of the 1950s.


Paul Butterfield retrospective, part 1:
https://www.harmonicahappyhour.com/paul-butterfield-retrospective-with-tom-ellis/

Was Butter a u-blocker?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-73mhQn4Pkc 


Podcast website:
https://www.harmonicahappyhour.com

Donations:
If you want to make a voluntary donation to help support the running costs of the podcast then please use this link (or visit the podcast website link above):
https://paypal.me/harmonicahappyhour?locale.x=en_GB

Spotify Playlist:
Also check out the Spotify Playlist, which contains most of the songs discussed in the podcast:
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5QC6RF2VTfs4iPuasJBqwT?si=M-j3IkiISeefhR7ybm9qIQ

Podcast sponsors:
This podcast is sponsored by SEYDEL harmonicas - visit the oldest harmonica factory in the world at www.seydel1847.com  or on Facebook or Instagram at SEYDEL HARMONICAS

Support the show

01:33 - Tom Ellis joins the podcast again for part 2 of the Paul Butterfield retrospective

01:56 - Is Butter the most significant harmonica player since the days of the classic players?

02:34 - The classic players had a limited audience, Butter brought blues to a more mainstream audience

03:11 - The Chicago blues scene of the 1950s did not have mass appeal at the time

04:00 - Following the 1950s the blues scene was mainly for acoustic blues artists. Butter brought some electricity!

04:24 - Butter didn’t get into blues on the back of the British Blues explosion of the 1960s

04:45 - Meeting Nick Gravenites got Butter into the blues, with Butter (and Charlie Musselwhite) frequenting the blues clubs in Chicago

06:00 - Butter’s first album release was 1965, and what else was happening with rock blues at that time

07:04 - The rise of rock-blues and Butter’s unique take on classic songs he recorded on his early albums

09:10 - Why The Lost Sessions album wasn’t released as Butter’s first album

10:08 - Butter wasn’t keen to add Mike Bloomfield to the line-up of the band

11:32 - The sound captured for Butter’s harp on The Lost Sessions was well produced

12:18 - How Butter approached playing Little Walter songs

13:41 - Recorded his own instrumentals, with Nut Popper being the first

15:15 - Harmonica was the lead instrument in The Paul Butterfield Blues band, and he gave the harmonica real presence

16:11 - Little Walter advised Butter not to blow so hard on the harmonica as it was damaging to the body

17:45 - Butter must have known Little Walter and the other older blues guys, as did Charlie Musselwhite

18:10 - The immediate success of Butter and his band

18:40 - Butter also helped relaunch the career of some of the classic blues musicians

19:02 - Was also a great singer

20:17 - After the success of the first album the band started playing outside of Chicago

21:04 - Increasing fame playing at the Newport Festival and the West coast of the US, playing 6 gigs in a night

21:41 - Was Butter influenced by jazz music?

22:49 - East West album saw a move away from playing blues songs, with the experimental nature of the music lapped up by the audience

24:27 - With a move towards rock blues the band were loud, with lots of amplification

25:37 - Made regular trips to San Francisco and relocated there to be part of the modern scene that was taking place there

26:32 - The Resurrection of Pigboy Crabshaw album, which had a horn section added and moved further away from blues

29:05 - Didn’t fear adding horns and giving them a strong presence in the band

29:34 - Also let other band members sing in the band

30:01 - Becoming more of a mature band leader with the Pigboy Crabshaw album, and knew how to read music and put together songs

31:09 - In My Own Dream album and how his songs were evolving

32:22 - Selected a lot of songs to record which did not originally have harmonica on them

32:44 - Horn player David Sanborn found the alto saxophone in a cab that he played on In My Own Dream song

33:42 - Sting loved the song In My Own Dream

33:59 - Butter’s music had become highly sophisticated by the time of the In My Own Dream album

35:20 - Keep On Moving album and Walkin’ By Myself

37:00 - Butter was moving more away from blues, with the band now more like a jazz ensemble

38:46 - Better Days album saw the end of the big band format and Butter feeling a little lost

40:03 - Better Days band was formed from an eclectic mixture of musicians from Woodstock

44:02 - Second album with Better Days band wasn’t as commercially successful

44:54 - Live album was released towards the end of The Paul Butterfield Blues band

45:31 - Tom’s favourite Butter song is Everything’s Going To Be Alright from the live album

46:24 - The raw energy of the live performances

47:12 - Later career was plagued by illness and drug issues

49:19 - Will we ever see a harmonica-driven band like Butterfield’s again?

51:02 - Levon Helm video suggests Butter could have used the u-block embouchre

52:02 - Butter didn’t need to play too rhythmically, so he didn’t have the same need to tongue block

52:55 - Did his flute playing have an influence on his embouchre?

53:48 - Had an amazing vibrato

54:34 - Butter played hard (but could also be nuanced)

55:04 - Tom and Neil’s favourite Butter songs (Everything Going To Be Alright & Just To Be With You)

56:46 - Tom’s future plans in writing about harmonica

WEBVTT

00:00:00.289 --> 00:00:02.573
Tom Ellis joins me again on episode 90.

00:00:03.455 --> 00:00:11.006
This is part two of the Paul Butterfield retrospective where Tom takes us even deeper into Paul's career and talks us through more of his incredible output.

00:00:11.827 --> 00:00:19.420
About how Butter, while paying his due respect to the greats before him, took the blues in a new direction with his experimentation and innovation.

00:00:20.341 --> 00:00:28.053
Butter's music and bands evolved as he developed, with the best musicians joining him to provide a bedrock to some of the greatest harmonica ever recorded.

00:00:29.217 --> 00:00:40.649
Tom Ellis puts forward a compelling case for Paul Butterfield as the most influential harmonica player ever, with his cultural and societal impact overshadowing even the classic players of the 1950s.

00:00:40.728 --> 00:00:45.573
This podcast is sponsored by Seidel Harmonicas.

00:00:46.014 --> 00:00:55.323
Visit the oldest harmonica factory in the world at www.seidel1847.com or on Facebook or Instagram at Seidel Harmonicas.

00:01:28.385 --> 00:01:30.528
Hello Tom Ellis and welcome back to the podcast.

00:01:31.009 --> 00:01:31.790
Neil, how are you?

00:01:31.850 --> 00:01:32.611
It's great to be back.

00:01:33.052 --> 00:01:41.222
You last joined me on episode 62 back on the May 27th, 2022, talking about the legendary Paul Butterfield.

00:01:41.302 --> 00:01:47.792
So we're doing a follow-up on Paul Butterfield because of course one hour program isn't enough to cover the great man.

00:01:48.031 --> 00:01:51.516
So thanks for coming back to talk some more about Paul Butterfield's career.

00:01:51.936 --> 00:01:52.957
Well, you're very welcome.

00:01:53.138 --> 00:01:55.602
As you said, one time is not enough.

00:01:56.034 --> 00:02:05.266
Yeah, and I think that's probably testament to the fact that, you know, as we're probably going to touch on here, he may well be the most important harmonica player possibly ever, at least since

00:02:06.787 --> 00:02:22.109
the classic players, yeah?

00:02:26.689 --> 00:02:33.575
is another reason, and maybe an even more important reason, that I consider him to be the most important harmonica player of the 20th century.

00:02:34.236 --> 00:02:34.977
Yeah, definitely.

00:02:34.997 --> 00:02:41.923
I mean, obviously, you know, we've got the classic harmonica players, Little Walter, etc., but they weren't so mass popular as Paul Butfield, right?

00:02:41.943 --> 00:02:49.210
And he really was able to bring, you know, a much more popular and mainstream view of blues and the other sort of music he branched into.

00:02:49.830 --> 00:02:50.631
You're absolutely correct.

00:02:50.691 --> 00:03:05.966
And I think one of the things that people do today is, in their effort or their acceptance of the romanticizing of blues history, they overlook some of the real critical timing issues that impacted things.

00:03:06.067 --> 00:03:11.331
I mean, you know, most of the players that I know today are young players, let's put it that way.

00:03:11.453 --> 00:03:19.581
They're infatuated with Little Walter and with Howlin' Wolf and, you know, people who really made their names in the early 50s.

00:03:20.033 --> 00:03:23.236
And up until, say, the 57, 58 period.

00:03:23.257 --> 00:03:25.778
And that was kind of the golden age of blues.

00:03:26.338 --> 00:03:29.641
But it was a golden age in a very small market.

00:03:29.762 --> 00:03:32.824
I mean, it wasn't the golden age of the blues in the United States.

00:03:32.884 --> 00:03:35.007
It was the golden age of the blues in Chicago.

00:03:35.608 --> 00:03:43.995
And I think people fail to understand how insulated the music scene in Chicago was in that early 50s period.

00:03:44.034 --> 00:03:55.312
And even though there are fabulous recordings and great, great examples of what they were doing, Prime It was a long, long time ago.

00:03:55.331 --> 00:04:04.973
And by the time Butterfield was getting, you know, hip to the blues, blues appreciation in the United States had been pretty much delegated to folk blues.

00:04:05.473 --> 00:04:16.439
primarily at places like the Newport Folk Festival, where you had a worshiping of people like Sun House and Lightning Hopkins and Brownie and Sonny and people like that.

00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:17.523
But they were all acoustic.

00:04:17.923 --> 00:04:23.617
And when Butterfield hit the scene, it was a significant change from that kind of blues appreciation.

00:04:23.970 --> 00:04:31.216
You know, obviously we hear a lot about the British blues boom and how that helped promote a lot of the, you know, the older previous generation black artists.

00:04:31.476 --> 00:04:33.458
So, but was he not part of that?

00:04:33.517 --> 00:04:40.124
Because he, you know, we talked about in the last time that he'd sort of played, you know, in the Chicago clubs and he met these guys and he played with Muddy Waters and things.

00:04:40.163 --> 00:04:42.925
So was it not a result of the sort of British blues boom that

00:04:46.228 --> 00:04:53.776
got him into blues?

00:04:53.935 --> 00:05:12.302
in a very personal way and had already reached out to a lot of these classic blues musicians like Muddy Waters and others who were, I don't want to say they were barely making a living, but their day had come and gone in terms of great popularity and there had been significant shifts in music and what people were listening to.

00:05:12.362 --> 00:05:18.750
So Gravanitis turned Butterfield onto this and dragged him down into these clubs.

00:05:18.831 --> 00:05:33.264
These guys, besides the fact they were fearless and people like Paul, and obviously Charlie Musselwhite, another huge, important person in telling that story of that transition from late 50s to early 60s.

00:05:33.324 --> 00:05:44.742
But I think Butterfield was obviously very attracted to this music and saw these players like Muddy Waters, the iconic godlike figures that they would come to be known as.

00:05:46.225 --> 00:05:51.153
So I don't think the British blues thing had really had anything to do with Butterfield's entry.

00:05:51.213 --> 00:05:59.980
Certainly, though I think the folks in your country were hip to the blues much earlier than the folks in my country were

00:06:00.321 --> 00:06:17.855
so talking years then I think so he the Paul Butterfield blues album I think came out in 65 but he was he was doing things before then and the lost sessions which we'll talk on to he recorded before then so what time wise did that sort of fit in with the you know the Rolling Stones and these sort of things was he just before them or about the same time

00:06:18.255 --> 00:06:29.766
well I think the two recordings probably are about the same time because the Stones you know they had obviously grown up on the blues and you know Brian Jones in particular was I think the the real blues lover in that band.

00:06:30.146 --> 00:06:31.648
They knew the vernacular.

00:06:32.007 --> 00:06:33.550
They understood the blues language.

00:06:33.889 --> 00:06:35.071
They had listened to everybody.

00:06:35.490 --> 00:06:44.899
But yeah, I think a lot of those, like the Muddy Waters or the Howlin' Wolf in London and some of those albums, I think they were probably around 65, 66.

00:06:45.740 --> 00:06:51.725
Certainly the Stones had what I would call hard blues tunes on some of their early recordings, so they were very aware of it.

00:06:51.944 --> 00:06:57.129
So they probably dovetailed around the same time as the first Paul Butterfield Blues Band album.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
...

00:07:00.482 --> 00:07:05.843
Paul certainly helps.

00:07:06.209 --> 00:07:09.894
You know, the popularity of blues and the sort of rock blues as well, yeah?

00:07:09.913 --> 00:07:12.295
And that's what was growing and having a big influence.

00:07:13.076 --> 00:07:22.906
That's a really interesting question because I think a lot of people think of Butterfield as a rock player or something other than a blues player.

00:07:23.408 --> 00:07:32.918
Certainly there's, you know, things like Fathers and Sons and Muddy at Woodstock and, you know, some of these things that show that he was definitely a blues player and a great blues player.

00:07:33.473 --> 00:07:36.677
But I think his approach to the music was very different.

00:07:37.338 --> 00:07:43.204
If you look at the Lost Sessions album, for example, it's almost a comprehensive approach to the set list.

00:07:43.725 --> 00:07:44.766
They've got Sonny Boy No.

00:07:44.786 --> 00:07:45.987
1, they've got Sonny Boy No.

00:07:46.028 --> 00:07:49.351
2, they've got Little Walter, they've got Jimmy Rogers.

00:07:49.372 --> 00:08:13.543
¶¶ got all these different people who authored the cuts on that particular CD, but the way it's presented is is very, very different.

00:08:14.004 --> 00:08:22.810
Every single cut that they do is obviously a testament to the forebears because they've selected specific songs by the Walters and that whole group.

00:08:23.432 --> 00:08:27.314
But the way they presented it was completely unique to them.

00:08:27.795 --> 00:08:36.702
So they honored them by using their songs, but they in no way tried to go back and capture that sound from the early 50s, for example.

00:08:36.802 --> 00:08:38.485
I mean, it's just not on the radar.

00:08:38.524 --> 00:08:40.567
And you don't hear it on the Lost Sessions.

00:08:40.586 --> 00:08:50.495
You If you listen to it, for example, to the way they do Just to Be With You, I mean, that's miles away from the way Muddy did it originally.

00:08:50.735 --> 00:08:56.621
And all of the songs are very similar in that approach.

00:08:56.642 --> 00:09:10.606
Well, baby, cry on till you're on my hands I'd do anything, anything, little baby Well, baby but

00:09:11.027 --> 00:09:23.937
yeah maybe tell us a story about that the lost sessions the so this is recording with electro you know what happened with that before they then obviously released the paul but for blues band album which was the first release wasn't until this one came out later

00:09:24.238 --> 00:09:43.255
yeah it was and this this was the one that was not good enough to release there's some really interesting things about this recording first of all paul rockchild who produced this was not known as a person who was producing music like this i think he was probably more of a folk-oriented music producer.

00:09:43.975 --> 00:09:52.404
Obviously, that changed radically after Butterfield because he became the producer for The Doors, which is, you know, a whole other genre of music, but definitely rock and roll.

00:09:52.785 --> 00:09:59.812
But he had been hired by Jack Holzman from Electra Records, who owned Electra Records, which was very much a folk label.

00:10:00.394 --> 00:10:05.099
He'd been hired to bring Butterfield into the studio and to record the band.

00:10:05.678 --> 00:10:11.385
After he listened to the band, he went and heard them play live a Right.

00:10:39.855 --> 00:10:48.125
always interesting and fit and had a tremendous propulsive characteristic that really pushed the music forward a lot.

00:10:48.745 --> 00:11:14.712
So this recording was made, and there's a little tiny bit of Bloomfield on here playing a little piano, maybe a guitar on a couple of cuts, but ultimately they decided that the recording was not going to be sufficient, and they went back into the studio, they added Bloomfield, and I think you heard or you can hear between the first recording recording and the lost sessions, you can hear the immediate impact that Bloomfield had on the band.

00:11:14.893 --> 00:11:18.937
I mean, it seems like a tighter, more musical unit.

00:11:19.337 --> 00:11:25.804
Butterfield's harp is still out front, you know, of course, but he's sharing the load, which he rarely ever did with Elvin.

00:11:26.164 --> 00:11:28.327
And this is on the Paul Butterfield blues album.

00:11:28.707 --> 00:11:28.927
Yeah.

00:11:29.328 --> 00:11:31.610
There was just a different level of sophistication.

00:11:31.650 --> 00:11:32.152
Yeah.

00:11:32.591 --> 00:11:40.120
One interesting thing I would like to point out about the lost sessions is the really wonderful job Rothschild did in recording Butterfield's harp.

00:11:40.660 --> 00:11:45.085
He really captured what he was doing, all the nuance, everything else.

00:11:45.884 --> 00:11:49.849
And at the time, there wasn't much amplified harp being recorded anywhere.

00:11:49.869 --> 00:11:52.850
That had all been done back in the 50s, you know, at the Chess Studios.

00:11:53.272 --> 00:12:09.206
The harp that you hear on the Lost Sessions is interesting to look at, especially as you compare it across his career and you look at the songs that appear on the Lost Sessions and then it appear elsewhere, you know, two years, three years, four years down the line, and how those songs have matured.

00:12:09.666 --> 00:12:17.696
and really become much more Butterfield's tunes than they are the tune of the originator because of this new way of playing them and approaching

00:12:18.236 --> 00:12:18.317
them.

00:12:18.356 --> 00:12:19.879
So we've got comparisons with Little Walter.

00:12:19.899 --> 00:12:34.538
You mentioned there on the Lost Sessions and also on the Butterfield Blues Band album, there's lots of songs from the sort of classic blues and there's quite a lot of Little Walter songs in there such as Mellow Down, Easy's on there.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
.

00:12:41.346 --> 00:12:47.495
And also last night.

00:12:47.596 --> 00:12:55.307
So he's recorded quite a few Little Walter, but how do you think he sort of changed the approach and didn't just mimic Little Walter's riffs and sound?

00:12:55.989 --> 00:12:59.153
I'm not an expert on everything Little Walter did.

00:12:59.618 --> 00:13:11.687
But I can tell you that if you listen to any particular song, like Hate to See You Go, for example, on this Lost Sessions, I mean, the lyrics are the same, but it's just not the same approach that Walter has on his version.

00:13:11.849 --> 00:13:15.211
It's just a completely unique way of doing the song.

00:13:15.351 --> 00:13:22.197
Obviously, it's ramped up in terms of the percussive aspect and the tempo, but it's very different.

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:00.000
...

00:13:29.583 --> 00:13:45.278
One thing that I've always found kind of almost amusing is that on that Lost Sessions and then also on the first Paul Butterfield Blues Band album, you know, Butterfield, he made a statement by playing his own instrumentals.

00:13:45.919 --> 00:13:48.721
He didn't try and record Juke or Roller Coaster.

00:13:49.121 --> 00:13:56.269
He came up with his own instrumentals, which was, to me, an indication that he thought of himself as that level of harmonica player.

00:13:56.548 --> 00:14:03.294
He could have his own instrumental tunes, and they could be played in a live setting, and they could be popular and fit.

00:14:03.735 --> 00:14:11.841
And that alone shows me just an incredible level of confidence to put together your own instrumental solos.

00:14:12.322 --> 00:14:16.586
Yeah, and so his first original instrumentals was on the last sessions was Nut Popper, yeah?

00:14:17.067 --> 00:14:17.967
Yes, that's correct.

00:14:34.567 --> 00:14:36.749
Very different from anything that Walter ever did.

00:14:37.149 --> 00:14:40.953
It's just a whole different feel, different set of chord changes.

00:14:41.474 --> 00:14:45.001
really really I mean it pops it's very propulsive

00:14:45.722 --> 00:14:56.346
yeah I mean you know where do you think that came from maybe it was just a case of you know music was a bit more modern you know it was more sophisticated you know than the sort of older blues you know do you think it's anything beyond that

00:14:57.268 --> 00:14:59.793
no I think that sums it up pretty well actually I really do

00:15:00.994 --> 00:15:07.606
And so when he's, you know, when he was playing, you know, was he seeing the harmonica being his kind of main thing?

00:15:07.647 --> 00:15:10.292
Obviously he sang as well, but we'll get into more of that later on.

00:15:10.312 --> 00:15:12.736
But, you know, was he really pushing the harmonica?

00:15:12.756 --> 00:15:15.000
Like you say, he was up front in the band and everything.

00:15:15.522 --> 00:15:15.783
Yeah.

00:15:15.942 --> 00:15:17.546
I mean, the harmonica was the lead instrument.

00:15:18.168 --> 00:15:19.068
And if you listen...

00:15:19.745 --> 00:15:35.239
almost to Butterfield's entire career, there's a way he hears the harmonica being placed out front in whatever he's doing, be it the Lost Sessions, be it In My Own Dream, be it the live album, be it Fathers and Sons.

00:15:35.298 --> 00:15:51.796
I mean, there's a level of, I guess the best way to describe it is a presence that he wants the harmonica to have in every single setting, regardless of whether he's very much a session guy or like on the Lost Sessions, he's playing these extended, very Very interesting, evolving solos.

00:15:52.176 --> 00:15:56.102
None of the phrases in any of these solos seem to repeat throughout the recordings.

00:15:56.484 --> 00:15:58.827
He's got a lot of ideas that are coming out all the time.

00:15:59.308 --> 00:16:10.909
But I think that presence that shows up on the lost sessions, being so much up front, so much in your face, that became the characteristic for him, for the way he saw the harmonica fitting in everything he did.

00:16:11.201 --> 00:16:14.264
You know, and then going back to Little Walter briefly, I mean, obviously he was a big fan.

00:16:14.465 --> 00:16:17.246
He's recorded numerous of his songs on the first couple of albums.

00:16:17.287 --> 00:16:19.909
So, you know, did he want to play a homage to Little Walter?

00:16:19.929 --> 00:16:22.672
Do you know what sort of, you know, what he felt about him or anything like that?

00:16:23.052 --> 00:16:26.674
Well, I relate a story that Norman Dayron told me.

00:16:27.275 --> 00:16:43.532
Norman Dayron was a producer, produced a lot of albums for Michael Bloomfield, was a very, very close friend of Michael Bloomfield, moved from Chicago to San Francisco not long after Bloomfield did, and was very involved in the Fathers and Sons recording.

00:16:43.932 --> 00:16:44.754
Very, very involved.

00:16:44.815 --> 00:16:48.260
In fact, I think he is the named producer on that recording.

00:16:48.662 --> 00:16:50.846
He told me a story one time about Butterfield.

00:16:50.865 --> 00:17:04.125
He and Butterfield and little Walter were at a bar And Butterfield and Little Walter were talking, and I'm sure he had that kind of relationship with all of these iconic figures from the Chicago Blues scene.

00:17:04.465 --> 00:17:11.432
And Walter was explaining to Butterfield that he had felt like he had done a lot of physical damage to his body because he blew so hard.

00:17:11.612 --> 00:17:12.772
He was a very hard blower.

00:17:12.833 --> 00:17:25.263
And he said, and I'm paraphrasing Norman here, he wanted Butterfield to understand that you could play very, very well, very effectively without having to kind of blow your body apart by blowing hard all the time.

00:17:25.263 --> 00:17:28.426
trying to get over the sound on the stage.

00:17:28.467 --> 00:17:36.415
And of course, when Little Walter played, sound was a much less complicated situation than it became.

00:17:36.435 --> 00:17:44.605
At the same time, it was much easier to be heard than it would become later on as amplification grew and amps got louder and louder and louder.

00:17:45.224 --> 00:17:50.411
But yeah, I'm sure he knew Little Walter and Jimmy Rogers and all of those guys.

00:17:51.071 --> 00:17:51.791
How could he not?

00:17:51.992 --> 00:17:54.976
If he was going down there, he and Muscle White were the guys.

00:17:55.036 --> 00:17:57.919
They were the guys that went down there that were the harp players.

00:17:58.118 --> 00:18:07.450
And if you listen to Charlie, probably on the podcast you did with him, I think I might have heard, he talks about sitting in with Big Walter.

00:18:08.171 --> 00:18:20.685
And don't forget, Butterfield, when the scene at Big John started up and Butterfield started playing there as this four-piece lost sessions group, they were an immediate success.

00:18:21.122 --> 00:18:23.325
And they were very, very popular.

00:18:23.365 --> 00:18:25.969
We talked a little bit about this in the podcast last time.

00:18:26.549 --> 00:18:33.199
But what that led to was bookings for, you know, the more traditional guys, the Muddy Waters.

00:18:33.400 --> 00:18:40.108
Apparently Butterfield and those guys would play on the weekends and then they'd try and get Muddy Waters booked during the week or Howlin' Wolf booked during the week.

00:18:40.549 --> 00:18:50.784
So Butterfield, besides being somebody who, you know, who knew these people and who was, you know, Honored them and believed in everything that they stood for from a blues standpoint.

00:18:51.305 --> 00:18:53.470
He was also a gateway for their careers.

00:18:54.332 --> 00:19:01.909
That would become very much the point when he started going and playing at the Fillmores in San Francisco.

00:19:02.550 --> 00:19:05.196
As to his singing, we definitely talked about his singing last time, but...

00:19:05.890 --> 00:19:07.392
You know, it was really crucial, yeah.

00:19:07.432 --> 00:19:11.115
And obviously he's a big part of his sound, certainly early on.

00:19:11.175 --> 00:19:15.760
And he sings on I Love His Drifting on this Butterfield Blues Band

00:19:18.864 --> 00:19:23.469
album.

00:19:30.355 --> 00:19:30.896
So what about the

00:19:30.916 --> 00:19:31.998
importance of his singing?

00:19:32.162 --> 00:19:41.948
I've been listening to the Lost Sessions off and on quite a bit over the last four or five months because there's so many incredible ideas in the harmonica playing and the solos.

00:19:42.910 --> 00:19:44.012
They're just so creative.

00:19:44.673 --> 00:19:51.560
But one of the things that I noticed in listening to this thing a couple of times is he's already becoming a great singer.

00:19:51.681 --> 00:19:53.782
His singing is obviously very important to him.

00:19:53.982 --> 00:19:57.205
It's not a throwaway, castaway thing that you just do.

00:19:57.507 --> 00:20:00.589
I mean, he's obviously trying to sell these messages already.

00:20:01.130 --> 00:20:13.142
And he's got that thickness and that gruffness in his voice, even as early as the loss sessions, that just would blossom and get stronger and better and more resonant as the recording career went on.

00:20:14.337 --> 00:20:16.701
He sort of rise to fame then after this album.

00:20:17.683 --> 00:20:21.411
Was he immediately then playing really big venues, lots of big festivals?

00:20:21.892 --> 00:20:23.776
How was his rise to fame?

00:20:24.517 --> 00:20:29.006
I think what happened with those guys is they started playing outside of Chicago.

00:20:29.346 --> 00:20:32.750
They were able to start getting gigs playing these colleges.

00:20:32.770 --> 00:20:39.519
I know they played, for example, the University of Wisconsin, day trips, day trip gigs around the Chicago area.

00:20:40.040 --> 00:20:42.724
Then they made a trip to New York.

00:20:43.286 --> 00:20:50.855
When I was doing my writing, Todd Rundgren told me that he had already heard or his group had already heard how great these guys were.

00:20:51.477 --> 00:20:59.339
They went to the first New York performances and literally sat on the front row every night and listen to the Butterfield Blues Band.

00:20:59.421 --> 00:21:20.651
So they began to build this notoriety among musicians on the East Coast When Newport happened, you had this entire culture of folk singers in the Boston area, in the New York area, in New England in general, including the Muldars and Queskin and a whole bunch of people that fell into that category that were there at Newport when Butterfield played Amplified.

00:21:21.011 --> 00:21:22.452
They now got to hear him again.

00:21:22.553 --> 00:21:24.576
They had already started to spread the word.

00:21:24.615 --> 00:21:26.817
Then there were trips made to the West Coast.

00:21:27.218 --> 00:21:28.920
The same thing happened on the West Coast.

00:21:29.000 --> 00:21:38.045
In fact, when they went to the West Coast, A gig for them was six or seven one-hour sets a night, and they would start at 10 and end up at four in the morning.

00:21:38.085 --> 00:21:40.814
I mean, this was a very professional band.

00:21:41.122 --> 00:21:46.851
You know, we've talked about how, you know, they sort of evolved the sound and, you know, it's getting more sophisticated.

00:21:46.891 --> 00:21:51.198
And we talked on the last podcast about how Butterfield's brother was really into jazz.

00:21:51.218 --> 00:21:52.398
So he'd listened to a lot of jazz.

00:21:52.419 --> 00:21:54.682
So there's clearly some jazz influences there.

00:21:54.702 --> 00:22:02.214
And then we got the East West album, which has got, you know, more sophisticated chord changes, sort of mixed with Eastern music and Indian music.

00:22:02.275 --> 00:22:09.566
So, you know, do you think this was a big influence on how we approach playing the harmonica as well with, you know, with more sort of jazz lines there?

00:22:09.730 --> 00:22:16.878
I mean, everybody always points to certain references for harmonica players, people they've listened to.

00:22:17.439 --> 00:22:23.926
But you also have to remember that in the late 50s and the early 60s, jazz was still very much heard on the radio.

00:22:24.548 --> 00:22:30.055
Miles Davis and Dave Brubeck and all of these people, they were on pop radio.

00:22:30.255 --> 00:22:31.036
Frank Sinatra.

00:22:31.135 --> 00:22:32.238
It's not like it is now.

00:22:32.898 --> 00:22:34.641
And so jazz was everywhere.

00:22:35.221 --> 00:22:43.336
So Paul, I'm sure, you know, heard music, heard a lot of jazz beyond, you know, what his brother had introduced him to.

00:22:43.396 --> 00:22:48.446
And I'm sure was, you know, pretty hip to what was going on because it was so available.

00:22:49.288 --> 00:22:54.778
And then on East West as well, he started branching out from blues, you know, did songs like Get Out of My Life and Mary Mary.

00:22:55.981 --> 00:22:56.061
Yeah.

00:23:05.826 --> 00:23:09.412
What about that and moving away from just traditional blues stuff?

00:23:09.692 --> 00:23:16.503
That was Butterfield finding songs he liked and playing songs he liked, not worrying about categorization.

00:23:16.624 --> 00:23:23.013
And of course, at the time, music wasn't stratified and categorized as it would become by the mid-70s.

00:23:23.414 --> 00:23:28.909
You could go out and almost be guaranteed that your audience had you know, had big ears.

00:23:29.028 --> 00:23:33.642
I mean, they were willing to accept you playing something other than what you were immediately famous for.

00:23:33.682 --> 00:23:37.913
It's not like today where people go out and they want to hear a band play nothing but their hits.

00:23:38.561 --> 00:23:40.483
I mean, there was just a different musical audience.

00:23:40.544 --> 00:23:53.255
Everybody was kind of sucking up everything they could, all these different influences and Bloomfield probably more so than anybody in that band at that time, you know, who was really looking at, you know, Eastern modal music and just completely different things.

00:23:53.674 --> 00:23:57.057
But, you know, he could do that because there was an audience that would accept that.

00:23:57.137 --> 00:24:05.826
And of course, with East West, that became, besides the fact that it was, you know, this incredibly long jam and there were very interesting changes and it was very jazz-like in a lot of ways.

00:24:06.465 --> 00:24:12.693
Remember, there was a huge audience for that music They played that music all the time, and it drove audiences crazy.

00:24:13.394 --> 00:24:28.076
If you're talking about

00:24:28.458 --> 00:24:31.201
amplification, I would think...

00:24:31.746 --> 00:24:43.003
based on the pictures I've seen from that mid-60s era, especially the Bloomfield era, when they hit the Fillmore, for example, they were playing at a volume far beyond what anybody was accustomed to from the Fillmore.

00:24:43.585 --> 00:24:47.171
Most of the San Francisco bands, they were not in-your-face loud bands.

00:24:47.431 --> 00:24:48.853
There was a folk thing.

00:24:48.873 --> 00:24:49.994
There was a message thing.

00:24:50.015 --> 00:24:58.598
There was a lot going on in their music, and I love all that music, but it wasn't It didn't have that in-your-face presence that Butterfield's band had.

00:24:59.059 --> 00:25:00.361
And they were playing through big amps.

00:25:01.102 --> 00:25:05.728
I mean, there's a famous picture on the live at the Fillmore Sessions.

00:25:05.887 --> 00:25:08.652
It's a bootleg, but I think available now in a lot of places.

00:25:09.393 --> 00:25:10.534
My memory serves me right.

00:25:10.934 --> 00:25:13.196
Butterfield is playing through a 410 Bassman.

00:25:13.438 --> 00:25:14.318
So is Bloomfield.

00:25:14.378 --> 00:25:16.662
Elvin's playing through a Super Reverb.

00:25:17.001 --> 00:25:18.083
These guys played loud.

00:25:18.423 --> 00:25:21.247
Probably stunned a lot of people that came to hear them the first time.

00:25:21.567 --> 00:25:23.250
They had so much presence on stage.

00:25:23.521 --> 00:25:24.084
Exactly.

00:25:24.124 --> 00:25:27.334
They wanted that energy, that presence, didn't they?

00:25:28.196 --> 00:25:29.299
Really building that, didn't they?

00:25:29.319 --> 00:25:30.463
To really push out that sound.

00:25:30.503 --> 00:25:37.285
Well, you know, there's that great line on the first album that says, we recommend you play this album loud.

00:25:37.730 --> 00:25:41.797
So, I mean, how long were they around San Francisco and what happened from there?

00:25:42.017 --> 00:25:46.625
Well, I think the San Francisco thing was, you know, was more trips out to San Francisco.

00:25:46.645 --> 00:25:48.107
They made trips to San Francisco.

00:25:48.147 --> 00:25:51.012
They did a long run at the Golden Bear down in the LA area.

00:25:51.574 --> 00:25:53.718
You know, it was touring is what it was.

00:25:53.837 --> 00:26:02.615
And then they would go back to San Chicago, but certainly it wasn't too many San Francisco trips that led them to kind of relocate out there.

00:26:02.655 --> 00:26:04.277
Elvin wanted to go out there.

00:26:04.356 --> 00:26:05.938
Bloomfield had already gone out there.

00:26:06.538 --> 00:26:14.665
So the band, I think, was maybe a little homeless to a certain extent in that they weren't really set up to just be in Chicago full time.

00:26:14.965 --> 00:26:22.252
But they wanted to be closer, obviously, to the more modern scene that was going on and obviously the new music that was coming out, too.

00:26:22.573 --> 00:26:24.314
And that wasn't to be found in Chicago.

00:26:24.374 --> 00:26:26.256
There was no rock and roll scene in Chicago.

00:26:26.256 --> 00:26:31.986
There was in Detroit, a huge one there, but Chicago was not that kind of place, but San Francisco was.

00:26:32.707 --> 00:26:32.928
Great.

00:26:32.968 --> 00:26:36.113
And then they released their next album, The Resurrection of Pig Boy Crabshaw.

00:26:36.173 --> 00:26:39.198
Was that then recorded out in the West, or was that one done?

00:26:39.459 --> 00:26:41.643
I don't know where that was recorded.

00:26:41.682 --> 00:26:43.325
It was produced by...

00:26:43.874 --> 00:26:51.594
a partner of their manager, Albert Grossman, who had run a very successful folk music club in Chicago for many, many years.

00:26:52.395 --> 00:26:54.121
But I don't know where they recorded that.

00:26:54.240 --> 00:26:57.388
I would be surprised if they did not record that in Chicago.

00:26:57.609 --> 00:26:59.315
Or they might have even recorded it in New York.

00:26:59.375 --> 00:27:00.637
But I'll have to look that one up.

00:27:00.930 --> 00:27:03.275
So that one had lots of horns on it.

00:27:03.435 --> 00:27:05.760
Was that the first one of his album which brought on lots of horns?

00:27:06.162 --> 00:27:06.943
Yeah, it was.

00:27:07.064 --> 00:27:09.849
And there's more than just a lot of horns on that album.

00:27:10.030 --> 00:27:11.133
I mean, you're certainly right.

00:27:11.192 --> 00:27:14.721
That was the main statement that was being made.

00:27:15.233 --> 00:27:17.597
This is a new version of the Butterfield Blues Band.

00:27:17.637 --> 00:27:19.240
Obviously, we're bringing people on.

00:27:19.319 --> 00:27:21.963
We're elevating the level of sophistication.

00:27:22.003 --> 00:27:25.088
This is the band I saw at the Miami Pop Festival.

00:27:25.849 --> 00:27:33.340
Distinctly remember, you know, Sanborn and Gene Dinwiddie given plenty of time to blow and play in solos and songs.

00:27:33.682 --> 00:27:39.309
I mean, it was no longer Butterfield plays all these harp solos, and there's also a really great guitar player.

00:27:39.349 --> 00:27:41.133
Now he was opening it up across the board.

00:27:41.733 --> 00:27:44.077
But, you know, the other thing he did, too, was...

00:27:44.481 --> 00:27:47.768
He started playing songs that were of that ilk.

00:27:48.127 --> 00:27:56.563
I mean, he seemed to be more in that Junior Parker kind of mode, although he continued to display his penchant for playing songs he liked.

00:27:56.663 --> 00:28:02.452
I mean, if you look at the very first song on that album, which is One More Heartache, that was kind of a regional hit for Marvin Gaye.

00:28:03.034 --> 00:28:03.575
Marvin Gaye.

00:28:03.595 --> 00:28:07.241
I mean, you don't think of Marvin Gaye as a blues guy at all.

00:28:07.586 --> 00:28:11.009
Born Under a Bad Sign, you know, that was a Booker T and the MGs tune.

00:28:11.049 --> 00:28:18.019
Again, Albert King made that super popular, but the way Booker T and them did it, you know, it wasn't a blues tune.

00:28:18.400 --> 00:28:21.923
And then you had Drive and Wheel, which is, you know, Junior Parker right off the

00:28:32.176 --> 00:28:32.237
bat.

00:28:32.257 --> 00:28:33.117
Like a leaf shaking on

00:28:36.481 --> 00:28:41.912
His ears are taking in all kinds of stuff and it's being regurgitated out and coming out in these bands.

00:28:42.011 --> 00:28:44.958
And it didn't have to be blues to become a part of the setlist.

00:28:45.357 --> 00:28:46.180
Yeah.

00:28:46.420 --> 00:28:51.068
So on Pity the Fool on that album, he sort of swapped solos with a horn player.

00:28:56.077 --> 00:28:56.157
Yeah.

00:29:05.281 --> 00:29:10.224
You know, you'd have thought obviously putting horns in there and giving them, as you say, lots of time to solo.

00:29:10.786 --> 00:29:12.867
You know, a lot of harmonic players might fear that, right?

00:29:12.907 --> 00:29:21.557
Because first of all, they might have a bit of an inferiority complex playing with horn players who obviously are very well versed in jazz lines and sophisticated lines, but also just sharing the time with them.

00:29:21.616 --> 00:29:23.358
So obviously he didn't fear that, right?

00:29:23.659 --> 00:29:24.941
That's super well said.

00:29:25.260 --> 00:29:27.323
And I think it goes beyond what you said.

00:29:27.363 --> 00:29:37.453
Not only was he allowing the horn players to, you know, to establish their own presence on stage, but, you know, the other thing he was doing is he started letting everybody sing.

00:29:37.634 --> 00:29:42.337
I mean, Bugsy Moss sings a couple of tunes on that album, and that was brand new.

00:29:42.397 --> 00:29:45.119
Nobody had ever sung on a Butterfield album but Butterfield.

00:29:45.520 --> 00:29:47.102
I mentioned this in the last podcast.

00:29:47.241 --> 00:29:52.707
There was an interview in Downbeat where Butterfield, and I'm paraphrasing again, said something to the effect that I've got all these great musicians.

00:29:53.106 --> 00:29:54.268
I don't want to play all the harp solos.

00:29:54.388 --> 00:29:56.430
I want them to play too because they're great musicians.

00:29:56.830 --> 00:30:01.153
And you start to see that trend happening with the Big Boy Crab Shaw album.

00:30:01.714 --> 00:30:04.196
Yeah, so he's turning into a band leader as much as anything here.

00:30:04.217 --> 00:30:08.881
Then if he's not playing that many harmonic solos and he's not singing then he's the band leader.

00:30:09.422 --> 00:30:21.555
Yeah, and you know, to me, you know, I think Butterfield, because of his experience as a flute player when he was growing up and, you know, studying with a famous flute player and that kind of thing, I think he understood how to read music.

00:30:21.855 --> 00:30:23.257
I doubt he could write charts.

00:30:23.757 --> 00:30:27.340
When this big band came out, it was like his ego kind of faded away.

00:30:27.641 --> 00:30:28.982
He did want to be part of the band.

00:30:29.022 --> 00:30:36.871
He was really concerned about this ensemble sound and how to make it good, regardless of what that meant to him as either a singer or a harmonica player.

00:30:37.192 --> 00:30:48.662
And, you know, When you bring in somebody like Gene Dinwiddie, who, you know, had studied with the AACM or had played with all the guys that were part of the AACM in Chicago, which was a very avant-garde group.

00:30:48.942 --> 00:30:50.042
Philip Wilson as well.

00:30:50.363 --> 00:30:53.445
These were guys who were, they really knew music.

00:30:53.746 --> 00:31:04.015
They were very well versed in how to write music, how to play music, how to present music in a different way from the guy who's getting up playing harmonica, you know, in a four-piece band.

00:31:04.234 --> 00:31:05.256
I mean, it was a very different thing.

00:31:05.296 --> 00:31:07.198
And he let him go with it, you know, and it worked.

00:31:07.905 --> 00:31:09.186
Yeah, absolutely.

00:31:09.207 --> 00:31:12.411
And then, so yeah, carry on through his album releases.

00:31:12.431 --> 00:31:14.933
So In My Own Dream, again, an evolution here.

00:31:15.074 --> 00:31:24.263
To me, if you look at all the Butterfield Blues Band recordings, and you start with very much with The Lost Sessions, because that's really the first in the studio recording.

00:31:24.924 --> 00:31:30.550
You know, there are songs like on The Lost Sessions, there's Just To Be With You, Everything's Gonna Be All Right.

00:31:31.132 --> 00:31:36.678
Those two songs, you know, popped up again and again and again on his recordings.

00:31:37.185 --> 00:31:44.457
And if you look, for example, at Just To Be With You from the musical standpoint, it really doesn't have any resemblance to what Muddy was doing.

00:31:44.777 --> 00:31:46.839
To me, it's a lot heavier than what Muddy was doing.

00:31:47.060 --> 00:31:50.265
And it's obviously evolved over time to what it became.

00:31:50.325 --> 00:31:52.628
It's not at all like it was on The Lost Sessions.

00:31:52.888 --> 00:31:54.211
It's something very, very different.

00:31:54.230 --> 00:31:58.877
I want to be with you, little girl.

00:32:07.394 --> 00:32:13.122
Butterfield was, you know, he's living in these songs, playing these songs night after night.

00:32:13.142 --> 00:32:21.775
And that's how you begin to mold and reshape and, you know, change the parameters of a song to fit what you want as opposed to the way it was originally recorded.

00:32:22.316 --> 00:32:32.871
You know, another thing that's interesting too is Butterfield picked a lot of songs, traditional blues songs that did not have harmonica on them originally, like Just to Be With You, which didn't.

00:32:33.291 --> 00:32:43.192
He was creating his own And then you've got a

00:32:45.979 --> 00:32:49.025
story about In My Own Dream with Sting and

00:32:49.065 --> 00:32:49.566
Sam Boyne.

00:32:49.826 --> 00:32:52.829
In My Own Dream, that's a really beautiful song.

00:32:53.191 --> 00:33:16.945
I think Sanborn told me it would tell anyone that it's one of the best solos he ever played, certainly at that time in his life and maybe for a couple of years after before he became more of a real traditional jazz guy.

00:33:16.965 --> 00:33:17.246
piano plays

00:33:23.137 --> 00:33:28.513
The horn that he used on that, he actually found in a cab, in a taxi cab.

00:33:29.057 --> 00:33:33.461
And this all came out in an interview that Sting did with Sanborn.

00:33:33.622 --> 00:33:40.988
And Sanborn told a whole story about how he found this horn, played the solo, and then lost the horn not long after that.

00:33:41.107 --> 00:33:42.529
It was kind of like the magic horn.

00:33:43.170 --> 00:33:44.550
But Sting loved that song.

00:33:44.590 --> 00:33:45.972
I was so shocked to hear this.

00:33:46.053 --> 00:33:52.357
And that was one of his favorite songs of any American musician and definitely his favorite Butterfield song.

00:33:53.298 --> 00:33:58.983
And when you listen to it, it has a sinewy, snaky way of getting under your skin

00:33:59.023 --> 00:34:04.575
As we're getting into this era of albums, I was listening again before, you know, the last week or two to his albums.

00:34:04.615 --> 00:34:12.230
And then, yeah, again, that word sophistication just comes, you know, these records are so mature and you're thinking, yeah, this is some beautiful music.

00:34:12.289 --> 00:34:12.570
Yeah.

00:34:12.650 --> 00:34:18.621
And, you know, I mean, you know, to add to that, I mean, Sanborn told me he worked on that solo album.

00:34:18.849 --> 00:34:20.351
Constantly, constantly.

00:34:20.452 --> 00:34:25.757
And it was incredibly frustrating to him at times where he'd want to throw his horn against the wall, that kind of thing.

00:34:26.159 --> 00:34:27.920
These guys were the real deal.

00:34:27.981 --> 00:34:29.141
This was no jam band.

00:34:29.181 --> 00:34:31.425
This was no pick-up kind of blues band.

00:34:31.525 --> 00:34:35.429
They were serious professional guys who knew what they wanted to do.

00:34:35.590 --> 00:34:40.014
And you certainly hear that on In My Own Dream.

00:34:40.876 --> 00:34:45.661
I mean, that song with Dinwiddie playing mandolin, I mean, that alone is...

00:34:46.498 --> 00:34:47.619
Totally unique to Butterfield.

00:34:47.639 --> 00:34:48.460
There was no mandolin.

00:34:48.920 --> 00:34:56.208
Yank Rachel, you know, he was a mandolin player, but they weren't trying to follow up on the way he sounded playing mandolin on blues.

00:34:56.827 --> 00:35:00.271
It's just a very, very different, super sophisticated piece of music.

00:35:00.311 --> 00:35:07.719
And I think on that entire album, I think In My Own Dream, it holds up as well today as it did the day it was released.

00:35:07.838 --> 00:35:08.259
It's still a

00:35:08.280 --> 00:35:11.382
beautiful song.

00:35:12.023 --> 00:35:20.820
¶¶ And then

00:35:20.860 --> 00:35:23.043
the next album is just keep on moving.

00:35:23.143 --> 00:35:26.487
So, well, one thing he does, he's still, he's still doing some of the old songs.

00:35:26.626 --> 00:35:34.335
He does a great version of walking by myself, which, you know, again, mentioned on here is quite often cited as the best ever harmonica solo by big Walter.

00:35:34.356 --> 00:35:36.177
So he sort of reworks that solo.

00:35:36.478 --> 00:35:51.791
I remember when this album came out and I looked at it and, you know, I saw walking by myself and I was, my first thought was, well, I guess there's another version of Walking By Myself, because no harmonica player has the nerve to try and play that tune, given what Big Walter did.

00:35:51.851 --> 00:35:58.623
I mean, that's one of the key pieces in the harmonica history, Walking By Myself and Big Walter.

00:35:59.065 --> 00:36:03.311
To me, it's Butterfield kind of saying, those guys are great, but so am I.

00:36:03.331 --> 00:36:04.673
I can play this too.

00:36:04.733 --> 00:36:09.181
And his solo, in no way, shape, or form is at all like Butterfield.

00:36:09.282 --> 00:36:10.123
Big Walters.

00:36:10.143 --> 00:36:30.963
Matter of fact, the whole song is

00:36:30.983 --> 00:36:31.224
different.

00:36:31.284 --> 00:36:32.126
So they did...

00:36:32.226 --> 00:36:34.449
less blues songs on this album.

00:36:34.469 --> 00:36:38.295
I think there's only two conventional blues songs on this album,

00:36:38.556 --> 00:36:38.896
yeah?

00:36:39.277 --> 00:36:39.978
Yeah, not much.

00:36:40.519 --> 00:36:41.722
You're absolutely right.

00:36:42.222 --> 00:36:48.793
Really and truthfully, it's Walking By Myself and then they do a pretty good version of Ray Charles' Losing Hand.

00:36:49.195 --> 00:36:52.900
But yeah, all these songs are, you would say, they're not blues songs.

00:36:53.538 --> 00:36:59.923
and the writing and the playing is uh very much distributed among the band members

00:37:00.483 --> 00:37:14.235
so i think this was released in the late 60s this one maybe maybe 69 so were they trying to move away you know it was still called the paul butterfield blues band at this stage right so were they trying to move away from that maybe you know get into a more mainstream was that part of the tactic do you think

00:37:14.275 --> 00:37:27.306
you know i think some of it was marketing yeah i i think you know in terms of of staying in touch with the mainstream everybody knew the name that paul butterfield This was certainly not a blues band at this point in time.

00:37:27.327 --> 00:37:32.512
I mean, this was almost a jazz ensemble, and some people might think it was.

00:37:32.592 --> 00:37:42.440
In fact, Downbeat, in one of the reviews of one of the albums that Butterfield put out, said something along the lines of, you know, Butterfield's keeping a large band sound alive.

00:37:42.481 --> 00:37:44.643
That's another interesting aspect of this.

00:37:45.003 --> 00:37:48.527
There were very few large bands circulating and playing at that time.

00:37:49.086 --> 00:37:50.248
Blood, Sweat& Tears were gone.

00:37:50.289 --> 00:37:51.389
Don Ellis was gone.

00:37:51.969 --> 00:37:56.114
Guys that carried horns with them, there just weren't many of them, and that was very important to Butterfield.

00:37:56.534 --> 00:38:08.409
But the other part of this is that if you look at the writing and who's been writing the songs, there's only two or three songs on this whole album that were not written by members of the band.

00:38:08.869 --> 00:38:16.117
That in itself, I mean, Buzzy writes one, Rod Hicks writes one, I think Dinwiddie's on a couple, Paul has one, Paul wrote No Amount of Lovin'.

00:38:16.577 --> 00:38:19.320
He's the only credited author of that song.

00:38:19.360 --> 00:38:30.670
So the band is really blossoming.

00:38:30.731 --> 00:38:34.474
It's really expanding far beyond what it was even with their last album.

00:38:34.614 --> 00:38:45.905
It's gotten much, much more of a unit that's making a statement about music that is coming from within, not taking music from without and trying to transpose that into what they want to do.

00:38:46.530 --> 00:38:52.286
so is then Better Days the next album and then this is you know the band changed at this stage it's a definitely different

00:38:52.449 --> 00:38:56.333
You know, the big band came to a kind of came to a crashing halt.

00:38:56.934 --> 00:39:03.659
And I think one of the reasons that happened was because music was changing in the late 60s and the early 70s.

00:39:03.739 --> 00:39:06.161
There was much more categorization.

00:39:06.282 --> 00:39:12.586
You know, the marketing guys were in there trying to make sure every recording got put in its proper bucket so it could be marketed properly.

00:39:12.628 --> 00:39:14.568
And the big band just didn't fit anymore.

00:39:14.648 --> 00:39:17.170
I mean, there weren't those kind of ensembles.

00:39:17.271 --> 00:39:22.416
And obviously, it's very expensive to keep, you know, an eight or nine or ten piece group all together.

00:39:22.416 --> 00:39:23.637
on the road all the time.

00:39:24.378 --> 00:39:28.443
So after it folded up, everybody kind of went their disparate ways.

00:39:28.503 --> 00:39:39.114
You know, the Horn guys went to Stevie Wonder and Buzzy and Philip Wilson formed this tremendously great band called Full Moon that is vastly underrated.

00:39:39.356 --> 00:39:40.797
Also, Dinwiddie was in that band.

00:39:41.277 --> 00:39:42.679
But everybody kind of went their own way.

00:39:42.699 --> 00:39:47.688
And I think there was a period there where Butterfield probably felt a little bit lost.

00:39:47.829 --> 00:39:58.338
I mean, he had been the leader of his own bands for six, seven years, working actively, spreading the fame of those bands around the country.

00:39:58.679 --> 00:40:00.420
And all of a sudden, boom, it's just over.

00:40:01.001 --> 00:40:03.163
And it was probably pretty hard for him to recover.

00:40:03.242 --> 00:40:05.445
So he was living in Woodstock at the time.

00:40:05.465 --> 00:40:11.331
Woodstock had become maybe the birthplace of the Americana music movement.

00:40:11.911 --> 00:40:18.163
I mean, I can't think of many places where there were that many musicians that were gathered together.

00:40:18.182 --> 00:40:21.429
I mean, Dylan was there and Richie Havens was there.

00:40:21.469 --> 00:40:22.471
The Muldars were there.

00:40:22.570 --> 00:40:23.652
Bobby Charles was there.

00:40:23.713 --> 00:40:24.954
Janis Joplin was there.

00:40:24.994 --> 00:40:28.039
Todd Rundgren was actually living there at that time.

00:40:28.079 --> 00:40:30.684
There were a couple of jazz guys that were there too.

00:40:31.346 --> 00:40:41.364
And so you had this melting pot and, There were a couple of little clubs slash bars, and these guys would get together and play all the time in these weird ensembles.

00:40:41.483 --> 00:40:45.668
I mean, it might be a couple of jazz guys and a couple of blues guys or a couple of folk guys.

00:40:45.708 --> 00:40:48.012
There was just music going on there all the time.

00:40:48.052 --> 00:40:52.617
And, of course, the focal point of everything, actually, Woodstock wasn't Dylan.

00:40:53.099 --> 00:40:57.864
It was Albert Grossman, and it was the band because the band was there.

00:40:57.905 --> 00:41:02.070
And, of course, they show so many diverse influences in their music.

00:41:02.242 --> 00:41:05.831
So when Better Days came about, all those guys were hanging around there.

00:41:05.851 --> 00:41:12.969
Almost all of them were being managed at the time by Albert Grossman, or they were playing with artists who were being managed by Albert Grossman.

00:41:13.634 --> 00:41:16.458
And it was a very odd ensemble.

00:41:16.777 --> 00:41:19.300
You had, you know, Ronnie Barron, who was a Dr.

00:41:19.360 --> 00:41:24.949
John kind of New Orleans kind of piano player, steeped in that deep New Orleans tradition.

00:41:24.989 --> 00:41:33.940
And then you had Butterfield and then you had Amos Garrett, who would later become the music director for Maria Mulder after she became famous for Midnight at the Oasis.

00:41:34.239 --> 00:41:35.141
But he was a Canadian.

00:41:35.585 --> 00:41:37.469
He was from, you know, Northwest Canada.

00:41:37.909 --> 00:41:47.925
Muldar, Jeff Muldar, who had been at Newport with Maria Muldar, his wife at the time, and had heard the Butterfield Band and, you know, was obviously very much a fan of what they were doing.

00:41:48.487 --> 00:41:51.112
Billy Rich, who, you know, played with Taj Mahal.

00:41:51.672 --> 00:41:54.878
And then Chris Parker, who was this young drummer who, you know, would...

00:41:55.041 --> 00:41:58.909
After he left Better Days, he went on to play with Stuff and jazz bands.

00:41:59.150 --> 00:42:02.918
So it was a real interesting mix, and everybody brought something to the table.

00:42:03.679 --> 00:42:12.436
Back to the marketing thing, one of the marketing things that was upsetting to Butterfield was he did not want this band to be known as Paul Butterfield's Better Days.

00:42:12.617 --> 00:42:14.860
He wanted it to be known as Better Days.

00:42:15.458 --> 00:42:19.445
And of course, you know, the marketing people said, there's no way in hell we're going to do that.

00:42:19.507 --> 00:42:20.648
We can't lose your name.

00:42:20.708 --> 00:42:22.152
Nobody knows who Better Days is.

00:42:22.211 --> 00:42:23.856
But that's how he felt about it.

00:42:23.896 --> 00:42:26.161
He didn't feel like it was him out front.

00:42:26.240 --> 00:42:32.574
He felt like it was, you know, a band, really an honest to goodness, democratic band.

00:42:47.266 --> 00:42:59.846
you know was there a change of style on these albums that you say there wasn't a big ensemble and wasn't a whole big horn section and is a bit more folk bass maybe because it's that woodstock connection

00:43:00.206 --> 00:43:17.581
yeah i think so i think very much that woodstock connection you know when you listen to that first better days album and and some of the live albums that are out you know there's a there's a There's two or three of those out right now that, again, are accessible, some on streaming services and some on eBay.

00:43:18.161 --> 00:43:20.625
But those guys, they're super professional.

00:43:20.704 --> 00:43:21.545
They're super tight.

00:43:22.027 --> 00:43:27.012
But the songs bounce around in terms of the emotional impact they have.

00:43:27.092 --> 00:43:35.922
I mean, there's just such a big difference between songs like Buried Alive and The Blues and then Small Town Talk.

00:43:36.385 --> 00:43:41.351
or Highway 28, and then something like Percy Mayfield's Please Send Me Somebody to Love.

00:43:42.773 --> 00:43:53.347
And if it's not asking too much, please send me someone to love.

00:43:53.766 --> 00:43:55.929
It's an interesting mix, really interesting mix.

00:43:55.969 --> 00:43:59.333
But again, these guys are playing what they want to play, and man, they pull it off.

00:43:59.675 --> 00:44:01.916
They make all these songs very much their own tunes.

00:44:02.530 --> 00:44:06.356
Yeah, and then the release of a second album with Better Days, does that put it in your ear?

00:44:06.476 --> 00:44:08.559
So you had two albums with him.

00:44:08.579 --> 00:44:11.865
So what commercial success did he have with these?

00:44:12.085 --> 00:44:14.530
Was he still doing well at this stage?

00:44:14.911 --> 00:44:19.197
Well, I think that the first Better Days was successful.

00:44:19.838 --> 00:44:26.791
They weren't selling millions of copies of it, of course, but I think that the album played well to Butterfield's audience.

00:44:27.050 --> 00:44:30.936
The tours that they did, were pretty successful tours.

00:44:31.378 --> 00:44:34.121
The band stayed together for quite a long time.

00:44:34.643 --> 00:44:39.771
But when they put out the second album, I think things kind of came apart.

00:44:39.891 --> 00:44:41.333
First of all, some of the guys left.

00:44:41.893 --> 00:44:46.340
The music, to me, wasn't as strong as it was on the first recording.

00:44:46.400 --> 00:44:49.344
There's still some great, great songs on that second album.

00:44:49.858 --> 00:44:53.543
But it doesn't have the impact that the first album had.

00:44:54.304 --> 00:45:02.735
A thing, again, we touched on last time was the live album that's released, a double album, which has got loads of tremendous long solos, some amazing playing.

00:45:03.115 --> 00:45:08.402
I think that was the last release, wasn't it, of the Butterfield Blues Band album before then that was sort of disbanded.

00:45:08.483 --> 00:45:09.264
Yeah, I think so.

00:45:09.505 --> 00:45:09.965
I think so.

00:45:10.266 --> 00:45:16.614
It might have come before Sometimes I Feel Like Smiling, but certainly the live one came out right around that end time.

00:45:16.675 --> 00:45:18.838
And there's so much great stuff on it.

00:45:19.170 --> 00:45:20.650
But so few people heard it.

00:45:20.670 --> 00:45:30.820
If they put the live album out after Pig Boy Crab Shaw or In My Own Dream, it might have had a much bigger wallop than it had when it came out.

00:45:31.702 --> 00:45:43.574
Literally from the opening four or five notes, I mean, I just don't think there's anything I've ever heard the level of a tour de force of that version of Everything's Gonna Be Alright and that opening solo.

00:45:43.594 --> 00:45:46.597
If you're a harmonica player, it's one of the greatest solos ever.

00:45:46.836 --> 00:45:47.097
Period.

00:45:47.717 --> 00:45:47.838
Period.

00:46:24.706 --> 00:46:34.400
We talked about the earlier albums are beautifully produced and some amazing songs, but to really get that raw energy of the live performances, that live album is fantastic.

00:46:34.920 --> 00:46:50.563
I had a friend who I grew up with who was obviously a big Butterfield fan, and he saw this band, the band that's on the live album, and they had Four Horns, and he saw them at a small club, well, not a small club, but a club in the Washington, D.C.

00:46:50.585 --> 00:46:58.795
area, and I remember him calling me and telling me, I just heard those guys and the sound was so big and so powerful.

00:46:58.815 --> 00:47:00.858
I felt like it pinned me back in my chair.

00:47:01.719 --> 00:47:05.949
He said they were just so overwhelmingly great.

00:47:07.190 --> 00:47:10.438
And I think that's evidenced by the live album.

00:47:10.657 --> 00:47:11.518
You can hear that yourself.

00:47:12.159 --> 00:47:19.065
So then getting into his later career, After Better Days, we talked about, again, on the last podcast, he played, he did a couple of albums with Muddy.

00:47:19.465 --> 00:47:25.971
And then he played with other, we played with other bands, Leeuwenhelm and the RCR, All Stars and a few other appearances.

00:47:26.492 --> 00:47:31.436
So, you know, wrapping up his career wise, you know, just finish off with, you know, his later career.

00:47:31.896 --> 00:47:36.099
Well, I think his later career was plagued by something that was not his fault.

00:47:36.300 --> 00:47:37.802
I mean, he obviously had some drug problems.

00:47:38.222 --> 00:47:45.092
He had a very, very bad case of pancreatitis with which is an incredibly painful disease and very difficult to get rid of.

00:47:45.152 --> 00:47:57.827
But the music scene here in the States, in that period of the mid-70s to maybe 80, for people like Butterfield, who had been part of a very vibrant music scene, scene was gone.

00:47:58.427 --> 00:48:07.255
When I talked to Bonnie Raitt, I talked to her about Butterfield, she said he was one of those guys that had been great, and he was just kind of a lost soul.

00:48:07.295 --> 00:48:08.956
Where am I going to go?

00:48:08.976 --> 00:48:10.217
I can't hold a band together.

00:48:10.257 --> 00:48:14.742
I don't have the audience that I need to be a successful live act.

00:48:15.202 --> 00:48:18.364
I can't be a successful live act unless I have a recording contract.

00:48:18.405 --> 00:48:19.786
There's a Catch-22 going on.

00:48:20.487 --> 00:48:29.454
Very, very difficult, and I think he was trying to find something, and on all of those recordings, you see him doing one of a couple of things.

00:48:29.976 --> 00:48:32.878
First, he's still recording what he wants to record.

00:48:32.978 --> 00:48:37.543
You know, he's finding music that he loves that he wants to interpret.

00:48:37.583 --> 00:48:42.869
The other thing he's doing is, and I think more importantly, he's trying to surround himself with great players.

00:48:43.250 --> 00:48:45.652
Butterfield always surrounded himself with great players.

00:48:45.992 --> 00:48:47.213
They spurred him on.

00:48:47.373 --> 00:48:52.159
They made him a lot of what he became by pushing him with the music that they brought.

00:48:52.460 --> 00:48:59.467
He could get great players around him for like Put It In Your Ear, you know, the album that he which should have been a huge success.

00:48:59.547 --> 00:49:02.231
But all the great players now, they were session men.

00:49:02.291 --> 00:49:07.759
They weren't interested in touring anymore unless the money was really, really good, which meant you had to be really successful.

00:49:08.360 --> 00:49:10.963
So I think he kind of just floundered.

00:49:11.204 --> 00:49:18.653
And I think that's probably one of the things that kind of led to some of the problems he had with drugs and the other things that would eventually take his life.

00:49:18.978 --> 00:49:45.197
Yeah and you mentioned that it was sort of an end of an era for that sort of band and that sort of you know to be able to tour and you know and that comes on to will we ever see a band like that and a harmonica player with such influence as Paul Butterfield since then or you know or in the future because yeah there's lots of great harmonica players some of which I've talked to on here you know great technicians do some amazing things but to have that sort of influence that he had you know will we ever see that again and have we seen it since him?

00:49:45.762 --> 00:49:49.367
Well, certainly, you know, Butterfield caught lightning in the bottle.

00:49:49.708 --> 00:49:53.672
And he was there at a time when there was a huge acceptance to music in general.

00:49:53.753 --> 00:50:04.347
So he could grow and expand and let his music evolve in a lot of ways, knowing that there was still an audience there and there were people who were willing to pay to go hear it and pay to hear it on vinyl.

00:50:04.989 --> 00:50:09.534
In terms of, you know, going beyond that, I mean, to me, there hasn't been a stylist like him.

00:50:10.036 --> 00:50:12.219
There's just nothing that I could compare it to.

00:50:12.239 --> 00:50:14.061
I haven't heard anyone...

00:50:14.594 --> 00:50:15.956
who can compare to him.

00:50:16.056 --> 00:50:28.896
But I also am very aware that the environment that he played in, the environment he created that allowed him to play the way he plays, is probably unreproducible at this point.

00:50:29.436 --> 00:50:40.335
I just don't know how anyone's going to put a band together that has all these different influences and confront the band and be a great singer and then have that incredible harmonica presence that he has.

00:50:40.956 --> 00:50:41.498
So I don't know.

00:50:41.538 --> 00:50:48.911
I'm hoping that my attitude that can't be reproduced is wrong and that someone will come along.

00:50:49.492 --> 00:50:58.690
And I certainly don't know what every harmonica player in the world sounds like, but I haven't heard anything that comes close to Butterfield for the last 20 years.

00:50:59.233 --> 00:51:01.596
Certainly one of the greatest, there's no doubt about that.

00:51:01.695 --> 00:51:05.980
So we can't talk about Paul Butterfield without talking about his embouchure.

00:51:06.059 --> 00:51:08.001
So it's a hotly debated topic.

00:51:08.061 --> 00:51:09.443
So let's get on to that one now.

00:51:09.663 --> 00:51:13.726
So he's kind of famously a puckerer and not a tongue blocker mainly.

00:51:13.786 --> 00:51:17.130
So there's a great English player I know called Laurie Gorman.

00:51:17.190 --> 00:51:20.172
He's a massive Paul Butterfield fan and has been for a long time.

00:51:20.271 --> 00:51:24.516
So he's raised the question that he actually thinks he might have been a U-block player.

00:51:24.956 --> 00:51:29.139
And there's actually a video with Leave On Home which might back this up.

00:51:29.199 --> 00:51:31.722
I'll put a link on that and people can check it out.

00:51:31.742 --> 00:51:35.666
So do you know anything about, you know, was he possibly a U-Block player or?

00:51:35.786 --> 00:51:36.708
That's a great question.

00:51:37.047 --> 00:51:38.789
I do not know the answer to that question.

00:51:39.010 --> 00:51:50.682
I tend to think though, again, I'm not a U-Block player and I don't know if I can contort my tongue into that shape, but there's a method he uses a lot where he plays, he plays a lot of dirty notes.

00:51:50.963 --> 00:51:53.226
Then you have a little bit of the note to the right or the left of it.

00:51:53.726 --> 00:52:02.356
And that he uses this technique strongly drawing up on three notes and closing it up to one note to give it more of a slap, more of a traditional tongue-blocking sound.

00:52:02.876 --> 00:52:13.251
The Walters and the Sonny Boys, those guys, when they came up, you know, late 40s, 50s, they were expected to have a rhythmic presence, and you can't get that lip playing.

00:52:13.351 --> 00:52:18.597
Well, you can, but it's very difficult to get it with the same impact that you get it with tongue-blocking.

00:52:18.637 --> 00:52:20.739
You know, Butterfield always had a rhythm guitar player with him.

00:52:20.860 --> 00:52:21.961
He always had a bass player with him.

00:52:21.981 --> 00:52:22.902
He always had a drummer with him.

00:52:23.043 --> 00:52:27.969
He wasn't trying to recreate the feeling of other instruments behind a song.

00:52:28.257 --> 00:52:36.211
And then he was a flute player, so he had that embouchure of single note with the way flute players approach their instrument and the way they exhale into it.

00:52:36.612 --> 00:52:43.385
So to me, the question of whether he was a tongue blocker or a lip player, it's kind of a who cares.

00:52:43.809 --> 00:52:47.253
The music he made is, to me, it just wasn't what he heard.

00:52:47.452 --> 00:52:48.753
He had the right tool for the job.

00:52:48.934 --> 00:52:54.719
He had the tool he wanted to use, and that's the tool he used, and he didn't care if that was the traditional way or not.

00:52:55.159 --> 00:53:03.086
I think that question around because he played flute, obviously, that might have given him quite a unique approach to his embouchure, which, you know, the vast majority of other harmonica players don't have, right?

00:53:03.106 --> 00:53:08.251
And whether that is, I don't know what embouchure flute players use, whether it's a kind of U-block thing, I don't know.

00:53:08.271 --> 00:53:09.052
It's

00:53:09.152 --> 00:53:15.016
not a U-block thing, but remember, the flute is a solo, it's It's a solo note instrument.

00:53:15.097 --> 00:53:16.559
It is not a chordal instrument.

00:53:16.798 --> 00:53:22.405
If your ear is tuned to the flute, it's tuned to single notes playing, you know, in combinations.

00:53:22.485 --> 00:53:24.246
It's not slapping and courting.

00:53:24.347 --> 00:53:26.489
It's also only blow notes.

00:53:26.630 --> 00:53:37.521
Yeah, it's also, it's only blow notes, which is one of the reasons, you know, I've always felt like, you know, in my studies of Butterfield's playing, he utilized the, you know, most harmonica players will come back to rest on the two draw.

00:53:37.681 --> 00:53:41.065
I think Butterfield utilized the three blow more than the two draw.

00:53:41.304 --> 00:53:43.467
I think he did that because it let him get rid of air.

00:53:43.728 --> 00:53:49.255
And the other thing you have to remember about Butterfield, and you really see this develop over his recording career, is his vibrato.

00:53:49.576 --> 00:53:50.777
It just kills me.

00:53:50.976 --> 00:53:59.407
The way he can turn it on and off and the way he can utilize it at different levels combined with different volumes and the nuance he generates.

00:53:59.728 --> 00:54:01.710
There's nobody that's ever played like that.

00:54:01.851 --> 00:54:06.177
There's no precedent for him to have said, I'm going to go try and copy this guy.

00:54:06.717 --> 00:54:10.141
That's his own very unique thing.

00:54:23.041 --> 00:54:34.391
You mentioned that Walter said to him, don't abuse your body too much to play the harmonica, but I think he might have ignored that advice because the amount of effort he puts into the, like you said, the vibrato, it sounds like he's putting a lot of his body into that.

00:54:34.492 --> 00:54:35.373
Ben, I totally agree with you.

00:54:35.413 --> 00:54:41.137
I mean, I saw him a couple of times and every time I saw him, these guys would be wringing wet with sweat afterwards.

00:54:41.257 --> 00:54:45.641
I mean, him in particular, you know, he was just very, very forceful.

00:54:45.702 --> 00:54:49.465
I think he was probably a really, really hard blower, but he could be nuanced.

00:54:49.485 --> 00:55:00.737
I mean, if you listen to some of that Better Days stuff, Rule the Road and those kind of songs where there's just, you know, this great nuance and use of hands to shape tone and vibrato.

00:55:00.956 --> 00:55:03.206
And yeah, but yeah, I think you're right.

00:55:03.226 --> 00:55:04.208
I think he was a real heartblower.

00:55:04.481 --> 00:55:06.505
Just last thing on Butter then.

00:55:06.525 --> 00:55:10.311
I mean, have you got a favorite song you'd cite or is it too hard to choose?

00:55:10.331 --> 00:55:10.351
I

00:55:11.311 --> 00:55:13.315
feel this way about just about all music.

00:55:13.514 --> 00:55:14.396
I want to hear it live.

00:55:14.637 --> 00:55:16.039
I want to hear a live recording.

00:55:16.460 --> 00:55:25.112
The fact you can go into a studio today and, you know, through Pro Tools and whatever else, copy anything or correct any mistake or basically create whatever you want.

00:55:25.634 --> 00:55:26.855
I want to hear something live.

00:55:27.056 --> 00:55:28.438
And the live album...

00:55:28.961 --> 00:55:32.025
I still, and I'll tell you, everything's going to be all right.

00:55:32.447 --> 00:55:35.831
It just still just blows my mind every time I listen to it.

00:55:36.010 --> 00:55:38.994
I've worked for years to try and play the first solo.

00:55:39.496 --> 00:55:41.539
And I got to the point where I thought I was pretty good with it.

00:55:41.659 --> 00:55:46.945
And then I spent a couple of days listening to it through headphones and realized I hadn't even scratched the surface.

00:55:47.586 --> 00:55:49.489
So there's just so much there.

00:55:49.730 --> 00:55:51.411
There's so much in that solo.

00:55:51.692 --> 00:55:58.942
And not just from a harmonica standpoint, but the band presentation, the guitar solo that follows, everything about that song is my favorite.

00:55:59.329 --> 00:55:59.811
What about you?

00:56:00.471 --> 00:56:01.893
Well, it's very hard to choose.

00:56:01.932 --> 00:56:03.135
Very hard to choose.

00:56:03.956 --> 00:56:08.800
Maybe One More Heartbreak is one of my favorites, or Just To Be With You, which is a song we've talked about.

00:56:08.822 --> 00:56:10.302
Those two, probably two of my favorites.

00:56:10.322 --> 00:56:13.726
But yeah, I love them all, as I'm sure a lot of people listening do.

00:56:14.588 --> 00:56:21.998
Well, One More Heartbreak, that's one of the rare third position things he does too, which is really cool.

00:56:22.018 --> 00:56:22.398
One More Heartbreak

00:56:32.353 --> 00:56:36.518
On that live at the Winterland, The Better Days thing, there's some great songs on there too.

00:56:36.737 --> 00:56:38.039
Some really, really great songs.

00:56:38.278 --> 00:56:41.322
And it's live, so it's worth giving a listen to.

00:56:41.342 --> 00:56:46.146
Thanks so much for joining again then, Tom, and telling us in more detail about Paul Butterfield.

00:56:46.206 --> 00:56:49.748
So, you know, just have you got any more plans to do anything else?

00:56:49.889 --> 00:56:52.150
Any more writing about Paul Butterfield or anything else?

00:56:52.592 --> 00:56:54.632
Well, I don't at the present time.

00:56:54.713 --> 00:56:59.777
I mean, I'm finding myself coming back to Butterfield in a way I really never expected to.

00:57:00.117 --> 00:57:02.320
And I'm listening to it over and over and more and more.

00:57:02.320 --> 00:57:08.266
more and appreciating it more so hopefully that'll get me you know inspired to put something put some words on paper

00:57:08.967 --> 00:57:29.693
yeah but but you know just remind again we talked about in the last podcast you know you've written a few articles on him and for the in the spa magazine you you wrote a couple of liner notes from a couple of his albums and you also interviewed the man himself so yeah you've certainly done some some uh deep work on him already but um he's continuing to work on on other artists aren't you and um you know you've got articles coming out in the spa magazine and

00:57:30.177 --> 00:57:55.539
Yeah, I'm really interested in, you know, in trying to bring to the harmonica community an awareness of a lot of the guys who, you know, we might call them the old guys, the old guard, people like Steve Geiger, for example, people like Mike Stevens, who plays a completely different type of music and lives up in Canada, people like Paul Reddick, who's also a Canadian who has a deep blues vibe to his music, but is kind of a singer songwriter at the same time.

00:57:55.579 --> 00:58:15.539
There are a lot of great players that are still playing out there that, you know, it's kind of like the old downbeat days they used to have an issue where they rated musicians most favorite musicians and they had a category called talent deserving wider recognition tdwr and that's kind of the mode i've been in lately to try and give some of these people more of their just dues because they are great players

00:58:15.661 --> 00:58:31.237
yeah absolutely and then you've helped me get some of those guys on the podcast i'm very grateful for that you know uh mike stevens last time fantastic so yeah really grateful for the help and you're like my north american correspondence over there to help me with linking me into the into the usa and Canada, of course.

00:58:31.496 --> 00:58:32.237
Let me say something.

00:58:32.297 --> 00:58:37.364
You're doing a service that has inspired me to try and do what I'm doing.

00:58:37.384 --> 00:58:48.054
Some of the interviews you've done, one in particular that I can think of just comes to mind immediately is the interview with Rod Piazza where you got Rod to talk a lot about the whole blues scene in Watson, LA when he was coming up.

00:58:48.114 --> 00:58:54.181
I mean, there's a lot of cultural stuff you're unearthing in interviewing these different players that has great value.

00:58:54.581 --> 00:58:55.884
So thank you for that.

00:58:56.143 --> 00:58:58.226
Thanks so much for talking to me today.

00:58:58.306 --> 00:58:59.266
I'm going to help him out again.

00:58:59.327 --> 00:59:02.032
I'm sure you'll be helping me out again on future episodes.

00:59:02.391 --> 00:59:03.454
Neil, thank you so much.

00:59:03.514 --> 00:59:05.777
It's always a pleasure to have these conversations.

00:59:06.239 --> 00:59:08.802
Once again, thanks to Zydle for sponsoring the podcast.

00:59:09.083 --> 00:59:18.981
Be sure to check out their great range of harmonicas and products at www.zydle1847.com or on Facebook or Instagram at Zydle Harmonicas.

00:59:19.521 --> 00:59:25.858
Thanks for listening again and thanks once again for Tom for joining us today and sharing all his extensive knowledge about Paul Butfield.

00:59:26.360 --> 00:59:36.126
I simply leave you now with Tom's favourite butter song, Everything Gonna Be Alright.